Force Politicians & Snivil Cervants To Remember They WORK FOR US; make Public Servants ACCOUNTABLE!
The corruption of some in Politics is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!
Wishing him Well & HELPING Bob FM To UNDERSTAND UKFirstParty!
for those of you who neither know nor have ever heard of Bob FM Bob Feel Martinis is a long ex Policeman with a near characature resemblence of Blutto and like many such indoividuals who then go on to bully their clientele as publicans he is his own worst enemy! The BFM is PPC for Swindon on behalf of Nigel Farage's party the EUkip.
Astonishingly as a newcomer this character perceives himself to be an expert, if not THE expert on almost every subject but hides his ineptitude, limited command of the language and inability to debate in anything approaching a grown up manner behind the cowardly propensity for either ducking issues or just conveniently absenting himself.
I had cause to write to him recently to wish him well with an upcoming TV interview he believed would be of some substance - mercifully for EUkip his appearance was VERY brief ashort bright red sweaty stumbling over his response I am told by various individuals who saw it.
Should you wish to understand why I say 'mercifully' may I suggest to view his accutely embarrassing and ill informed efforts on YouTube in the name of EUkip!
Here is the correspondence in full:
> Hi, > > as a lifetime opponent to the concept of the Franco Germanic > (Vichy/Nazi?) concept of A Greater EUrope and having grown up in a > Military Home as my Father was RAF and every day I walked through a > Memorial Arch with 1,000s of names of lads from my school who died in > Military Service – the school where both Haig & Birdwood were educated > and then having lived in Germany in the early 1960s etc. etc. > > I have had the great good fortune to travel extensively and see just > what incredible benefits my Country has brought to this planet and the > values that have proved the bedrock of the growth of civilisation. Also > after joining The Army and then selected for the 2 years at Sandhurst I > left the army on ISSUES – namely the Regiment I was joining was on > standby to go into Rhodesia to fight ex pats in favour of insurgent > terrorists, also members of The Regiment were actively fighting in > Viet-Nam but not in British Uniforms which I found unacceptable etc. etc. > > That was neither the end of my service nor the end of military style > activity. > > I have opposed the tight and dangerous constraints of Globalisation or > ANY surrender of Sovereignty since my early teens. > > It is on these grounds that I have been a VERY active opponent of The EU > and our membership, the Tory Party where I have had active influence at > a higher level than most. I appreciate you have only recently become aware. > > I have been phoned and informed that you have obtained a slot on TV > sometime next week – Good Luck. > > Do not for a moment believe that I am other than a dedicated supporter > of UKIP – but you will appreciate that I will not aid or support the > corruption and dishonesty that is EUkip and will actively campaign > against that corruption which is EUkip that has so befouled the aims of > decent HONEST individuals who are the grass roots of UKIP. > > For as long as you are man enough to campaign against membership of The > EU and distance yourself from the lies, bullying, dishonesty and > corruption that is now so prevalent in EUkip that it is a close thing as > to whether UKIP can be saved – it is starting to look as if it can not. > > If EUkip won 70 seats in The EU it would be a catastrophic failure for > our Country – if UKIP could win JUST ONE it would be an achievement of > value. > > Victory of the vile EUkip with its loss of values, lack of ethics, > greed, dishonesty and collusion with the EU as just usefull idiots for > The EU – a part of The EU establishment as they are now seen by my many > contacts in the EU – their victory is Britain’s failure that can be > measured in much the same terms as if the horrors of a BNP Government > were manifest. > > I understand your aggressive defence of EUkip but by now surely you can > see the difference between the 2 wings of the party – UKIP & EUkip! > > If you espouse the aims and values of UKIP to the best of your ability > for TV accept my very best of luck in the spirit it is meant – I know > all too well how hard it is to deliver a fault free performance having > done literally dozens of Radio slots and several TV pieces on the > subject – including a 30 minute documentary some years ago, in which I > included Norris McWhirter (Possibly before your time). > > Good luck – you can ONLY do your best and if you confine yourself to the > basic values of UKIP rather than the befouled EUkip you will have done well. > > Regards, > > Greg L-W. > > Whether you publish this letter or not is YOUR choice.
-----Original Message----- From: Robert Feal-Martinez [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org] Sent: 25 April 2009 08:12 To: email@example.com Subject: Re: TV Broadcast - GOOD LUCK
Dear Mr Watkins,
As matter of courtesy I acknowledge receipt of your email and your wishes of 'Good Luck'. I have no wish to engage in additional exchanges, however I am somewhat at a loss as to how given your apparent high moral values that you are supporting UKFP, when you acknowledge they have been set up by some who you expose as corrupt. Is that not a contradiction.
From: Greg Lance-Watkins [mailto:Greg@GlanceBack.Demon.co.UK] Sent: 25 April 2009 14:53 To: 'Robert Feal-Martinez' Subject: RE: TV Broadcast - GOOD LUCK
I trust the broadcast went well and was rather better than your earlier performances on YouTube which were clearly the beginning of a learning curve.
Is the interview available on You Tube or elsewhere on the internet as I am sure the recent material would be better posted up than your earlier damaging efforts.
Since you opted to enter correspondence by rhetorically asking a question I am perfectly happy to clarify for you.
Bob FM: >I am somewhat at a loss as to how given your apparent high moral values<> I am glad that my determination to use only the truth and be sure that I do not intentionally or dishonestly mislead anyone is apparent to you.
Bob FM: >that you are supporting UKFP,<> As yet there is no reason to NOT support them, though I have probed them fairly deeply, at this stage they seem to be unlikely to achieve much with so late a start. Let us hope that they can use their position in the election process to firstly raise their profile sufficiently to build on the position afterwards.
More importantly let us hope they can use their position to expose the staggering corruption, dishonesty, incompetence and lack of competent leadership of EUkip who have proved such a catastrophy for the EUroSceptic movement - achieving so little from such a position of potential strength.
It would be a pleasant achievement if UKFirstParty were able to muster sufficient support to ensure that in The Eastern region EUkip were unable to return the contemptible serial failure and utterly dishonest David Bannerman, a man without principles, values or overly much ability - unfit to represent decent men and women of these United Kingdoms in any region. He is a liar and a cheat on a self enrichment programme.
The thought that individuals who have acted so dishonestly and corruptly out of self interest as Stuart Agnew, a monied farmer seeking his own interests in elevation within the EU as a representative of the fundamentally corrupt NFU.
The dishonest Andrew Smith who with Nigel Farage has put the party at risk of loss of over £500,000 in forfeiture and costs and garnered a guilty verdict for for EUkip, by their offences, in the Courts!
That the vile and parasitic Mick McGough can be considered suitable for a position in EUkip and on their lists when he has endlessly supported the dishonesty and unprofessional incompetence of Andrew Smith and lied and cheated his associates, in his own right, damaging what pretence at honesty EUkip may lay claim to.
I trust this clarifies my position which is based on proven facts in the Eastern Region.
As for the South East Region I feel sure you will see the need to expose the corruption of EUkip there if for no other reason than to ensure that the discredited political prostitute Marta Anreassen whether using her maiden or married name being clearly an irrelevance she is dishonest and corrupt willing to participate in dishonesty for personal gain. She has not a single justification for her pretence at upholding British values and her residency is a dishonest fudge - her book keeping skills would seem serially to be called into question yet she is now well salaried with generous expenses to do a job that could be done by either plausible British accountants or pro bono.
That it has been considered appropriate to squander such amounts needlessly on a woman of her discredited ethics calls into question the entire leadership as it shows they lack judgement and have conmtempt for the electorate and members - you will appreciate that it was Monnet's dream that national groupings, traditions and values would be eventually subsumed by cross border representation - how convenient that EUkip were the useful idiots to carry out his aims.
Clearly due to his abject failure as a leader Nigel Farage, a man without basic morality and talentless beyond a steadily withering schoolboy charm and a competence of practice in producing the bon mote of soundbite or one of about 3 set piece rants - clearly will give the party a new lease of life after the election when he honours his promise to resign when he gets 10 or less MEPs.
The great tragedy as it stands is that a vote for Farage in the South East is clearly a vote for Andreassen as I am sure that having undertaken so publicly to resign when it is shown just howmuch he has damaged EUkip by his leadership his seat will, by EU law, go to the next person on the regional list of the party concerned - that would put the odious and proven corrupt Andreassen in a very strong controlling position in EUkip - an horrendous thought.
Bob FM: >when you acknowledge they have been set up by some who you expose as corrupt.<> Interestingly you claim I have exposed SOME as corrupt - perhaps you would care to clarify your justification for pluralizing, as I believe I have merely stated that:
Del Young for all his merits clearly was incompetent as it was he who had so clearly failed to put in place the web site for the 'Original' launch and it was clear that he could not hold office without providing a detailed CV and clarification of employment or lack thereof - a principle that EUkip should surely have insisted on had they not seemingly been exploiting him on racist grounds. That Del had sat on EUkip's NEC as it became ever more corrupt yet never spoke out did not bode well as it showed him to be if not party to the corruption at very least to weak to be of calibre for a position in leadership. So it has proved and Del Young is no longer a part of UKFirstParty I understand.
Peter Cole - I contended that it was unwise to involve him due to his employment by Tom Wise - you will no doubt concede by now that Tom Wise's position is not one to throw glory on any in his proximity and that Nigel Farage was willing to accept stolen money to settle a personal debt, as reported in the media and seemingly established by Robin Collett and David Lott, was dishonest and possibly criminally misguided of Farage. That Farage made no clear effort to remove Tom Wise has led many to assume that he feared revelations Wise may make.
The first the public or members knew of any effort by Farage to distance himself from Wise was when he glibly lied to on News Night claiming EUkip had acted immediately they were aware of the matter and withdrew the EUkip whip from Tom Wise. This as you know was an outright and deliberate lie.
Interestingly Tom Wise continued to sit as a EUkip MEP on the pro EU Ind.Dem.Group chaired by Farage until the Saturday prior to the expose in The News of The World, when Tom Wise resigned from the pro EU IDG. Wise continued to sit as a EUkip MEP and was a branch chairman until he resiogned from the later position earlier this year and from his EUkip MEP position when his membership expired last month.
You may recall the unarguably corrupt and dishonest Douglas Denny in total dereliction of duty and dishonest misrepresentation blocked any attempt to hold a disciplinary hearing to permit Tom Wise to either clear his name or be ejected from the party - he made absolutely no effort to establish the facts beyond a self important and ill mannered demand made of Daniel Foggo with one working day notice to give up his weekend to attend a EUkip NEC meeting - this after an abusive and insulting series of eMails to Mr. Foggo and his paper!
It is for the very simple reason that I believe Tom Wise to have been shown to have brought EUkip into disrepute and the fact that Tom Wise was under arrest and on bail and that I knew beyond much doubt (Officially) that Tom Wise & Lindsay Jenkins were to be charged as the police had all the evidence required to make such charges with every probability of a giuilty verdict that I openly stated that Peter Cole's involvement as an officer of UKFirstParty was unwise - never did I intimate that Peter Cole was other than honest though I am happy to question his judgement.
The only other party whom I criticised was Bruce Lawson and I published a letter which indicated to me and others that he may well have been involved in corruption in respect of the Welsh Elections for EUkip - this was far more an indictment of EUkip than of Lawson and I believe that Lawson has been able to clear himself of his involvent in this particular chicanery - I gather the bulk of the £170,000 was in fact provided by Alan Bown, based on the utterly dishonest expectations sold to him by Nigel Farage and the idiotic belief that importing a drunken buffoon, who shortly after drank himself to death, would help EUkip in Wales - a largely Methodist based region with a widespread teatotal base amongst many of the older voters!
That I believe the serial entrepenuer and bed and breakfast king of Montgommeryshire has ANY of the skills needed for leadership is another point - I do not and arrogance is often a cover for stupidity a quality Lawson seems to have in large measures.
That said I have no reason to believe that Lawson is deliberately dishonest though I question his competence and have reason to doubt his common sense - whom the UKFirstParty may eventually choose to lead them is a matter for them and it is my prerogative to criticise if I so wish and provide provenance to back my stated opinions.
Inept and incompetent, arrogant and ill mannered as Bruce Lawson may be it was he who arranged registration of The Party and it was he who grasped the nettle to launch the party. One can only applaud him for that and let us hope that in the fullness of time they find individuals more suited to the offices.
You will note that EUkip after 15 years still lacks competent leadership and has seemingly attracted absolutely no one of probity, integrity or calibre to its leadership team - seemingly scum rises in a septic tank along with the other solids visible!
Bob FM: >Is that not a contradiction.<>
Perhaps with the explanation I have provided above you will understand a little better the ease with which you seem, in your prejudice, to have misled yourself. May I suggest in future you do not constantly assume others behave in a manner similar to you and consider the facts not merely the spin.
I hope this helps and you are welcome to publish my comments if it would be of help to your credibility which is clearly on a rather low ebb. I would appreciate it however if you would be so good as to avoid publishing parts out of context or drawing conclusions as on your track records they are unlikely to be honest or accurate.
It is very sad for many of us who are long term dedicated supporters of UKIP to see it so befouled as it now is, if EUkip were to gain 70 MEPs it would be a far more visible declaration of failure than if it has 3 elected! The likely figure is 3-5 based upon the static inertia and habit vote of protest - I do not believe that EUkip has a single candidate who could be elected on merit or based upon expectation of achievement - no amount of dressing up as chickens or playing the drunken fool mitigates the abject failure of the low lifes both current and proposed.
I believe that the best vote is to treat the election as a referendum and write LEAVE THE EU on your ballot paper - minded that many will not have the courage to do this and will be tunnel visioned enough to believe they should squander their vote on a political wanabe then I advocate they vote UKFirstParty where they are standing AS AN ALTERNATIVE - though I would still vote LEAVE THE EU.
There is a reasonable argument for the return of Labour both on June 4th. And at the General Election as they are more likely to bring the EU to its knees than any other party likely to form a Government! At the very least the incompetence of Labour may lead to The EU being on its knees praying for Britain to leave! RESULT ;-)
I hope this helps your political understanding and rather broadens your seeming tunnel vision having come to the 'fray' rather late in the day!
Regards, Greg L-W. 01291 - 62 65 62
For further information on The UK First Party which claims to be a non-racist, non-sectarian party bookmark this page and come back to the Blog regularly and we will try to keep you up to date.
TO LEAVE THE EU
What is the exit and survival plan for these United Kingdoms to maximise on the many benefits of leaving The EU. It is the DUTY of our Politicians and Snivil Cervants to ensure the continuity, liberty and right to self determination of our peoples they have a DUTY to protect against crime and secure both our food and our border. NONE of these DUTIES has a single British politician upheld for 40 years. They have drawn their incomes fraudulently and dishonesty. Politicians are failing to tell the truth, but so are almost all wanabe Politicians, the MSM and Snivil Cervants.
The fact is that even if EVERY British MEP wanted change in The EU it would achieve NOTHING.
Every single British Politician, of EVERY Party, elected since before we joined the EUropean Common Market, has promised to change The EU's CAP - In 40 Years they have achieved absolutely NOTHING!
To try to put a value on OUR Freedom is as futile as floccipaucinihilipilification and as odious as the metissage of our societies, as we rummage in the ashes of our ancestors dreams, sacrifices and achievements, the flotsam of our hopes and the jetsam of our lives, consider the Country and Anglosphere which we leave our children and the future, with shame!
Regards, Greg L-W. 01291 – 62 65 62
PLEASE POST THIS TAG AS FOLLOWS:ON YOUR eMAILS & BLOGS, FORUM POSTINGS & MAILINGS - GET THE MESSAGE TO THE PEOPLE IT IS OUR BEST HOPE AS WHOEVER IS APPOINTED WILL MAKE NO DIFFERENCE AS PROVED!
I SUGGEST – where UKFirstParty is not standing and there is thus clearly no political party of repute, advocating or campaigning for withdrawal of these United Kingdoms from the EU and restoration of our independent sovereign, democracy, with Justice & the right to self determination in a free country.
Deny the self seeking & meaningless wanabe MEPs the Mythical Mandate for which they clamour. Diktat is imposed from The EU but Law should be made at Westminster, for our Country & our Peoples.