Sunday, 12 July 2009



Force Politicians & Snivil Cervants To Remember They WORK FOR US; make Public Servants ACCOUNTABLE!

The corruption of some in Politics is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!



This clearly speaks volumes of the type of odious individual Peter Cole is and it is also clear that he is not remotely interested in the reputation of either his employer Tom Wise or the party he was a member of be that EUkip or UKFirstParty.

Interestingly this was sent to a UKFirstParty member in the false belief they might react and let on who was involved with Junius in their defence I presume.

What a vile old man Peter Cole has shown himself to be. He has very much displayed his gutter origins and the chips on his shoulders in his insecurity and jealousy - one need only note his fear of anyone with intelligence - no wonder he was happy working for Wise and endlessly misleading people.

Here is the sum total of his errudity!

We note that as late as June 12th. he was still using Tom Wise's facilities further bringing the naicent UKFirtsParty into ever greater disrepute, minded that Tom Wise is under arrest and released on Court bail for fraud, theft of tax payers money, embezellment, money laundering, false accounting or whatever - he next has to surrender to bail with Lindsay Jenkins on 15th. July - the day after he ceases to be a EUkip elected MEP, at Southwark Crown Court to make plees I understand.

Subject: RE: Proposed Draft Agenda
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 09:06:19 +0100


I appologise for the language but it is a measure of the man!

Below is a suggested agenda for a meeting drawn up by Drew Belobaba which seems to make emminent sense.

Drew was the party Press Officer at this stage if nothing else in titular form!

Drew is also a long term associate of John Petley, Petrina Holdsworth and Martin Hasslam and I believe also knows John West and has met Robin Page - I presume also Bruce Lawson and Peter Cole!

Drew is also a qualified solicitor with experience of 'party building' in small party politics.

Here were his suggestions which were round robinned for suggestion and discussion:

Dear everybody,

Drawing on what Peter has proposed as well taking into account issues that have arisen in various emails, I've drafted up an Agenda for our next committee meeting, a copy of which is attached. I've also included it in the body of this email. As you can see I've put the adoption of new members to the front of the agenda. It seems to me that we need representation from the East Midlands and that Ian Gillman should be included, and possibly another from there as well so that they have a reasonable level of representation on the committee. I've also put Len Baynes down for adoption as he has been pretty active in the Eastern Region and seems to be a sensible chap. Some of you may have other suggestions which we should discuss beforehand.   Assuming there no objections to the proposed addition to the committee, we should invite them to the meeting and adopt them as the first piece of business, thus allowing them to participate in the remainder of the meeting as full members of the committee.Â

The second item on the agenda is how the committee is to operate. As long as it has remained small in size and we have all been focussed on a small set of goals (getting the party up and running, fighting an election) then it can operate by consensus. However if the committee becomes larger, and we beging discussing issues such as strategies and the future of the party I expect that it will be much harder to reach a consensus on every issues and we will run the danger of being unable to decide anything. Therefore I think that before we continue with the meeting we need to hammer out the method by which the committee is to operate in the future.

I don't think there is any real appetite for change in the assignation of various roles. If everyone is happy to continue in their positions I think we should simply confirm them in these positions and carry on. I've put in Petrina as vice-Chair as I understand that Bruce has said that he views her as a co-chair. We may also want to assign other positions such as regional organizers and as suggested by Peter, a vice-website coordinator. Â

Please can we discuss and reach consensus on these first and third agenda items by round robin email beforehand so we don't waste time on them at the meeting. I think they are in the nature of housekeeping matters. I expect that there could be strong opinions voiced on the second item and therefore it will likely be the subject of some debate at the meeting.

Of course this is just my proposal for what should be on the agenda of the meeting. You may all have different ideas. Please forward your proposals or criticisms to me and I can put it all together into a new agenda.


1. Proposed adoption of new members to the committee.

- Len Baynes
- Ian Gillman

2. Nature of the committee (ie are issues to be decided by consensus or by majority vote)

3. Confirmation of the holders of the following positions:
- Chairman (Bruce),
Vice-Chairman (Petrina),
Membership (Secretary), Press Officer (Drew),
Treasurer (Martin),
Website Manager  (John P)
regional organizers (???)

4. Chairman's Report

5. Treasurer's Report

6. Membership Secretary's report

7. Discussion of election results.

8. Norwich parliamentary by-election

9. Membership recruitment strategies

other ex-UKIPers
current UKIPers
- members of other parties/general public

10. Possibility of merger with other small parties

11. Developing a permanent party constitution

12. Any other business

Peter Cole having clearly no management skills, no common sense and no manners clearly saw his authority beiginning to slip away - he obviously wanted the role of Martinette!

So he made a complete prat of himself:

----- Original Message -----
From: "UKFP"
To: "Drew Belobaba"
Cc: "UKFP" ;
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 2:30 PM
Subject: Re: Proposed Draft Agenda

As Drew, a non member of the Consensus Committee, seems to have taken command, please remove me from all your e-mails, you will need to find someone to collect the mail and you will need to register website domains and not use the ones registered in my name.

You are more than welcome to be assosiated with John West and G.L-W, I am not.


John clearly has the measure of the poor old man!

Interestingly Peter Cole was in regular communication with John West until he shamefully set out to rip him off when he heard that Robin Page really had little interest in standing for more than a year if elected and it seems a pact was made by Cole & Lawson to lie and without ANY consultation use the none too bright Len Baynes as their dupe and alter the AGREED list.

It was obvious that UKFP were NOT going to get an MEP elected but greed seems to have blinded Cole & Lawson!

From: john west []
Sent: 11 June 2009 16:02
Subject: RE: Proposed Draft Agenda

Dear Peter, Please stop acting like a petulant child. John

As I have said in early Blogs on this Blogspot the presence of Lawson, Cole and Young would ensure the party collapsed as between them they had not an ounce of sense.

I hear from correspondence that Ian Gillman has expressed his displeasure at the antics of Cole and that John West AND John Petley have added their letters of resignation to that of Petrina Holdsworth - Robin Page has always seen Lawson and Cole for what they are and although considering Young had SOME ability as a speaker he had clearly nothing else to offer.

For further information on The UK First Party which claims to be a non-racist, non-sectarian party bookmark this page and come back to the Blog regularly and we will try to keep you up to date.


What is the exit and survival plan for these United Kingdoms to maximise on the many benefits of leaving The EU. It is the DUTY of our Politicians and Snivil Cervants to ensure the continuity, liberty and right to self determination of our peoples they have a DUTY to protect against crime and secure both our food and our border.

NONE of these DUTIES has a single British politician upheld for 40 years. They have drawn their incomes fraudulently and dishonesty.

Politicians are failing to tell the truth, but so are almost all wanabe Politicians, the MSM and Snivil Cervants.

The fact is that even if EVERY British MEP wanted change in The EU it would achieve NOTHING.

Every single British Politician, of EVERY Party, elected since before we joined the EUropean Common Market, has promised to change The EU's CAP - In 40 Years they have achieved absolutely NOTHING!

To try to put a value on OUR Freedom is as futile as floccipaucinihilipilification and as odious as the metissage of our societies, as we rummage in the ashes of our ancestors dreams, sacrifices and achievements, the flotsam of our hopes and the jetsam of our lives, consider the Country and Anglosphere which we leave our children and the future, with shame!

Greg L-W.
01291 – 62 65 62


I SUGGEST – where UKFirstParty is not standing and there is thus clearly no political party of repute, advocating or campaigning for withdrawal of these United Kingdoms from the EU and restoration of our independent sovereign, democracy, with Justice & the right to self determination in a free country.

Deny the self seeking & meaningless wanabe MEPs the Mythical Mandate for which they clamour. Diktat is imposed from The EU but Law should be made at Westminster, for our Country & our Peoples.

Write Upon Your Ballot Paper:


No comments:

Post a Comment